Ella Auchincloss

Senior Project Consultant

This is the fourth and final installment of our series investigating if tax credits could be a source of sustainable financing for population health.

In December, the ReThink Health tax policy research team traveled to Oakland, CA to present our work on tax credits to the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine’s (NASEM) Population Health Roundtable workshop titled Exploring Tax Policy to Advance Population Health, Health Equity, and Economic Prosperity. We had spent the previous seven months exploring how tax credits can be used to spur investments in population health. Over this period, our team took a deep dive into the topic by examining the variety of tax credits in all 50 states and then sorting them into a rational typology before finally settling on the types of credit that would be most useful for population health purposes—the ones we’ve been sharing these past weeks on the blog. We believe that sharing the results of our work could help demystify this topic and potentially shift big, meaningful resources in new, critical directions.

I had the privilege of serving on the NASEM workshop planning committee with a diverse group of tax policy professionals and roundtable members. One goal for the workshop was to explain how tax policy could channel resources and shape incentives to advance population health. Another goal was to equip our participants with enough confidence to inspire a new dialogue between population health advocates and state and local fiscal authorities. We were impressed by the turnout and the variety of participants—from population health policy officials and academics to community activists. All were, no doubt, inspired by the timeliness of the topic given in the national debate about tax reform.

The planning team faced a fairly big challenge: equipping participants with the basic language and skills to navigate a very complicated policy domain. No one (apart from our presenters) considered themselves more than beginners on the subject of tax policy, according to our early polling of the room. The planning team offered a basic road map or cheat sheet (see graphic below) for participants to reference when they were confused about the kinds of taxes or tax incentives we were discussing. We also asked each presenter to focus on the crucial elements of tax policy design—we wanted participants to learn how to evaluate what works and what doesn’t when thinking about tax policy and population health in their own contexts. After providing a basic primer on taxes and the condition of state budgets, our presenters offered specific examples and opportunities for shaping incentives and creating a pipeline for financing population health in their regions. The workshop agenda and roster of our excellent presenters, including our very own Stacy Becker, Amanda McIntosh, and Nina Burke, can be found here.   

After the presentations, we asked participants to work in small groups to design a tax policy to raise money for a local wellness fund, which is a catchment for funds invested in population health interventions, in a fictional state we named “Ourlandia.” For me, this was the highlight of the day. We saw these “beginners” use key design principles to create a wide variety of consumption and production taxes on things like cigarettes, morphine production, guns, bullets, and even the use of tanning beds! But they didn’t just create taxes. We also observed them considering how to stimulate a donor market through charitable tax credits. It became clear to me that by demystifying this topic, this group was already quite qualified to lead the conversations we need to be having with state and local fiscal leaders. The workshop was streamed live, so there are likely many more out there who are ready to go. In fact, the workshop trended on Twitter due to the robust conversations that were inspired by the presenters and activities.

Here are my key takeaways from the workshop, for anyone interested in influencing tax policy to advance population health:

    • Advocate for more of what already works, but don’t expect that this is nearly enough. One workshop participant made the excellent point that we already have some great tax policies—the Earned Income Tax Credit and the Child Tax Credit are effective at addressing the social determinants of health. He’s right! All of us who care about social determinants should do more to advocate for these policies AND simply advocating for these policies alone does not go far enough. The fact remains that some of the most effective interventions remain woefully funded. Getting smart about tax policy can change this.
    • Gain fluency in discussing ways to ensure that existing tax credits are associated with interventions that are proven to work. There are numerous examples of how tax policy has successfully shaped collective norms around energy use, home ownership, and private investment. But not everything has been effective or successful. Many presenters encouraged participants to become fluent in discussing ways of redirecting existing tax credit policies that aren’t achieving their intended impact toward interventions that are proven to work. This means that we need to be well versed in what works and what doesn’t, and be ready to demonstrate the potential effectiveness of shifting tax policy toward population health.
    • Demand access to policy design tables, especially those influencing tax policy—it could be an important means to financing population health. Nick Johnson from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities described how the arcane language of tax policy is inherently designed to exclude and disempower the public. In my view, this pattern cannot be broken unless groups that have gained a basic understanding about key tax policy drivers are in a better position to influence policy design. While community stakeholders have been effective at organizing around the need for interventions to address public problems (such as childhood obesity or type 2 diabetes), they’ve barely considered how to best position themselves to influence how the money will be raised to fund the intervention.
    • Take care to ensure perfection isn’t the enemy of the good. Xavier Morales from The Praxis Project in Oakland shared how well-meaning public health advocates failed 30 times in their efforts to pass a soda tax in Berkeley. Advocates felt strongly that the initial design reflected the best possible aims for public health. But the Praxis Project and its partners eventually succeeded where others failed because they settled for “political good” instead of “public health perfect.” 

      Earlier efforts went unsupported by the community because the tax burden was placed on people already ravaged by the diseases caused by over-consumption. Plus, the organizers had little trust that the tax monies would be invested in the places most affected. So, instead of creating a “public health perfect” tax to discourage consumption at the consumer level, they negotiated a distributor tax to mitigate the regressive impact. They also won the fight to keep the monies raised in Berkeley to fund school-based nutrition programs and community programs to change awareness around healthy food practices for communities of disadvantage. This is kind of the strategizing we need if we are to be successful in shaping tax policy to advance the population health. In fact, this particular strategy has since worked in Albany, Oakland, San Francisco, Boulder, and Cook County, Illinois.

One of the workshop presenters noted that enacting tax policy is a balancing act among competing interests. Many sectors are already out there making sure their interests are being represented. Those of us working on health system transformation also need to gain a seat at this important table in order to shape incentives and create new funding streams. We need to learn the basic language, shine a light on how tax policy is relevant to our work, and identify partners (including state policymakers) who can help us enact new approaches. Hopefully the resources we have presented in this blog series will help you begin this critical process.

Keep thinking with us! Please watch the NASEM conference videos here and invite us into your conversation about tax policy and health system transformation. We also invite you to leave a comment below about how you imagine we could use tax credits as a source of sustainable financing for population health.

The personal views and opinions expressed in this blog (and in any comments) are those of the original authors only, and do not reflect the opinions of The Rippel Foundation or ReThink Health. Neither The Rippel Foundation nor ReThink Health is responsible for the accuracy or validity of any of the information contained in the blog or any comments. All information is provided on an “as-is” basis.

Join the Conversation

Top